157. Deputy Sorca Clarke asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation the procedures that apply where the Protected Disclosures Commissioner does not accept the opinion of an “other suitable person” that a matter does not fall within that person's remit; the procedures thereafter that apply to the report; and the safeguards that apply to ensure appropriate and independent follow-up. [69782/26]

This parliamentary question seeks clarification on the legal processes used when the Protected Disclosures Commissioner disagrees with an expert's assessment regarding a whistleblower report. It aims to ensure there is a clear, transparent pathway for handling such disagreements and maintaining the integrity of the reporting process. The inquiry affects public officials and whistleblowers in Ireland. It focuses on the safeguards and independent follow-up mechanisms required to ensure that protected disclosures are handled correctly even when jurisdictional disputes arise.