Skip to content
Feed/INI2024/2106(INI)Institutional

Possibilities for simplification of cohesion funds

COMCMT1R-EP1R-C2R-EPCNCADO
Rapporteur Vladimir PREBILIČCommittee REGIUpdated 8mo ago
View source

This resolution calls for simplifying the rules and processes for managing EU cohesion funds to make them more accessible and efficient for projects aimed at reducing regional disparities and fostering economic and social convergence across the EU. The changes primarily affect local and regional authorities, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), civil society organisations, and beneficiaries of cohesion funding, aiming to reduce their administrative burdens and improve project implementation. Key changes include a push for greater digitalization, avoiding 'gold-plating' (extra national rules beyond EU requirements), streamlining audit procedures, and ensuring timely adoption of programming documents to prevent implementation delays. The resolution emphasizes maintaining the core principles of cohesion policy, such as shared management and a place-based approach, while exploring new digital tools and simplified cost options to enhance transparency and effectiveness.

AI-generated·4 Apr 2026·Source document·Unverified

Cohesion policy is identified as the EU's primary investment tool for reducing economic, social, and territorial disparities.

What changes

  • The resolution emphasizes the need to transition from hybrid and paper-based administration to fully digital processes for managing, reporting, monitoring, and auditing EU funds.
  • The Commission is called upon to propose the standardization and broader use of simplified cost options and financing not linked to costs.
  • The resolution calls for more direct access to EU funding for regional and local authorities, cities, and urban authorities.

Expected impact

  • Simplification efforts aim to reduce administrative burdens on beneficiaries, facilitating their access to funds and decreasing administrative work.
  • The resolution suggests removing certain technical regulations and requirements from the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR) and incorporating them into guidelines or a handbook to create certainty.
  • Increased administrative burdens have created a deterrent effect, discouraging beneficiaries from applying for cohesion policy funding and limiting its overall effectiveness and accessibility.

Limitations

  • The document is a resolution and does not contain specific legislative text that would allow for a detailed analysis of proposed changes to regulations.
  • The analysis is limited to the factual statements and recommendations presented within the resolution text.

Some data sources haven't been updated in over 48 hours.

assemblee_nationalejust now
audit_findings3d ago
austria_lobby_registerjust now
belgium_lobby_registerjust now
bundestagjust now
bundestag_lobby_registerjust now
camera_deputatijust now
cap_payments3d ago
chambrejust now
cohesion_financejust now
congresojust now
cordis3d ago
council_positions3d ago
denmark_lobby_registerjust now
desi3d ago
ec_commissioner_meetingsnever
eduskuntajust now
eea3d ago
eib_projectsjust now
ep_draft_agenda1d ago
ep_open_data_meps2h ago
esif3d ago
european_council_summits3d ago
eurostat3d ago
eurostat_cofogjust now
eu_transparency_register2h ago
finland_lobby_registerjust now
folketingetjust now
folketinget-calendar4d ago
fts3d ago
hatvp_lobby_registerjust now
howtheyvote_votesjust now
ireland_lobby_registerjust now
lobbyfactsjust now
nationalratjust now
nationalrat-calendar4d ago
netherlands_lobby_registerjust now
oeil_legislative_proceduresjust now
oireachtasjust now
plenary_agendajust now
public_consultations3d ago
riigikogujust now
riksdagjust now
rrf_allocationsjust now
sejmjust now
spain_lobby_registerjust now
sweden_lobby_registerjust now
ted_procurementjust now
transposition_tracker1d ago
tweede_kamerjust now
wikidata_parliaments13d ago