The new security law in Hong Kong and the cases of Andy Li and Joseph John
The European Parliament strongly condemns Hong Kong's new security law, the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO), passed in March 2024. Parliamentarians argue this law further restricts basic freedoms and violates international commitments, building upon China's existing National Security Law. This resolution highlights the cases of Andy Li, a pro-democracy activist allegedly tortured into a confession, and Joseph John, an EU citizen arrested for online posts. It also mentions Polish national Aleksandra Bielakowska, detained and deported. These cases illustrate the law's impact on activists and individuals. The SNSO is criticized for undermining press freedom and potentially hindering the work of EU institutions and citizens in Hong Kong. The resolution calls for the repeal of both the NSL and SNSO, and the release of detained activists. The Parliament urges EU member states to suspend extradition treaties with Hong Kong and China. It also calls for sanctions against officials responsible for the crackdown and the establishment of support systems for at-risk activists and journalists.
Analysis
The Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO) was passed on March 19, 2024, expanding the National Security Law (NSL) and authorizing infringements of freedoms.
What changes
- The Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO) has been adopted, expanding the existing National Security Law (NSL) in Hong Kong.
- There is a call for the immediate and unconditional release of Andy Li, Joseph John, Jimmy Lai, and other detained activists.
- The Council is urged to review its conclusions and adopt sanctions against officials responsible for the crackdown on freedoms in Hong Kong.
Expected impact
- The SNSO expands the NSL, potentially leading to more radical infringements of basic freedoms and liberties in Hong Kong.
- The SNSO's extraterritoriality and retroactivity could impact EU citizens, organizations, and companies operating in Hong Kong.
- The adoption of the SNSO is seen as erasing the last vestiges of fundamental freedoms and leading to the shutting down of pro-democracy forces.
Limitations
- The document does not provide specific details on the legal basis for the alleged confessions under torture.
- The document does not detail the specific provisions within the SNSO that authorize the infringements of freedoms.
- The document does not specify the criteria for the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime that would be applied.
Some data sources haven't been updated in over 48 hours.