Skip to content
Feed/RSP2024/2521(RSP)Foreign Affairs

Situation in Serbia following elections

COMCMT1R-EP1R-C2R-EPCNCADO
Updated 27mo ago
View source

The European Parliament has expressed serious concern over the integrity of Serbia's December 2023 parliamentary and local elections, stating they deviated from international standards. The resolution highlights issues affecting Serbian citizens, including pressure on public sector employees, potential vote buying, and concerns about the accuracy of voter lists. Key changes and obligations include calls for an independent investigation into alleged widespread fraud, particularly in Belgrade's municipal elections, and demands for Serbia to implement election observation recommendations. The Parliament urges Serbian authorities to investigate irregularities, prosecute offenders, and ensure fair conditions for future elections, linking progress to Serbia's EU accession process.

AI-generated·3 Apr 2026·Source document·Unverified

The Serbian parliamentary and local elections on December 17, 2023, deviated from international standards and commitments due to the incumbents' systematic abuse of institutions and media for unfair advantage.

What changes

  • The Commission is urged to launch an initiative for an expert mission to Serbia to assess recent elections and post-election developments.
  • Serbian authorities are urged to investigate, prosecute, and bring to justice those responsible for criminal offences during elections and any attacks on students.
  • Serbia is urged to implement the OSCE/ODIHR recommendation for a comprehensive audit of the unified voter register to address accuracy concerns.

Expected impact

  • Failure to investigate and sanction electoral manipulation contributes to impunity and the continuation of such practices, undermining trust in Serbia's electoral process and European integration.
  • The erosion of media freedom, characterized by political pressure and attacks on journalists, places Serbia among the lowest in Europe for press freedom.
  • Accession negotiations with Serbia should only advance if significant progress is made on EU-related reforms, including implementing OSCE/ODIHR and Venice Commission recommendations.

Limitations

  • The document does not contain specific details on the methodology or findings of the European Court of Auditors report mentioned.
  • The document does not provide a detailed breakdown of the 'systemic rule of law issues' in Serbia beyond the context of elections.
  • The document does not specify the exact nature of the 'co-facilitated parliamentary dialogue process' in Serbia.

Some data sources haven't been updated in over 48 hours.

assemblee_nationalejust now
audit_findings3d ago
austria_lobby_registerjust now
belgium_lobby_registerjust now
bundestagjust now
bundestag_lobby_registerjust now
camera_deputatijust now
cap_payments3d ago
chambrejust now
cohesion_financejust now
congresojust now
cordis3d ago
council_positions3d ago
denmark_lobby_registerjust now
desi3d ago
ec_commissioner_meetingsnever
eduskuntajust now
eea3d ago
eib_projectsjust now
ep_draft_agenda1d ago
ep_open_data_meps2h ago
esif3d ago
european_council_summits3d ago
eurostat3d ago
eurostat_cofogjust now
eu_transparency_register2h ago
finland_lobby_registerjust now
folketingetjust now
folketinget-calendar4d ago
fts3d ago
hatvp_lobby_registerjust now
howtheyvote_votesjust now
ireland_lobby_registerjust now
lobbyfactsjust now
nationalratjust now
nationalrat-calendar4d ago
netherlands_lobby_registerjust now
oeil_legislative_proceduresjust now
oireachtasjust now
plenary_agendajust now
public_consultations3d ago
riigikogujust now
riksdagjust now
rrf_allocationsjust now
sejmjust now
spain_lobby_registerjust now
sweden_lobby_registerjust now
ted_procurementjust now
transposition_tracker1d ago
tweede_kamerjust now
wikidata_parliaments13d ago