Skip to content
Feed/IMM2024/2089(IMM)Institutional

Request for the waiver of the immunity of Petras Gražulis

COMCMT1R-EP1R-C2R-EPCNCADO
Rapporteur Pascale PIERACommittee JURIUpdated 12mo ago
View source

This decision concerns a request to waive the immunity of Petras Gražulis, a Member of the European Parliament, to allow criminal proceedings against him in Lithuania to proceed. The request affects Petras Gražulis, who was elected to the European Parliament in June 2024. The alleged offence occurred in 2022 when he was a member of the Lithuanian parliament. The waiver is based on the principle that parliamentary immunity protects members for actions related to their duties. The alleged offence, publicly ridiculing a group based on sexual orientation, is not considered related to his duties as an MEP. The European Parliament has decided to waive the immunity, allowing Lithuanian authorities to pursue the case. The decision will be communicated to the relevant Lithuanian authorities and to Mr. Gražulis.

AI-generated·3 Apr 2026·Source document·Unverified

The European Parliament decided to waive the immunity of Petras Gražulis.

What changes

  • The European Parliament has decided to waive the immunity of Petras Gražulis.
  • The President is instructed to forward the decision and committee report to Lithuanian authorities and Petras Gražulis.

Expected impact

  • The waiver of immunity allows criminal proceedings against Petras Gražulis to proceed in the Republic of Lithuania.
  • The alleged offence is not related to opinions expressed or votes cast by Petras Gražulis in his duties as a Member of the European Parliament.
  • Parliamentary immunity is a guarantee of the independence of Parliament and its Members, not a personal privilege.

Limitations

  • The document does not contain information on the specific outcome of the criminal proceedings following the waiver of immunity.
  • The document does not detail the potential consequences for Petras Gražulis beyond the waiver of immunity.
  • The document does not provide an analysis of the legal arguments used by the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Lithuania.

Some data sources haven't been updated in over 48 hours.

assemblee_nationalejust now
audit_findings3d ago
austria_lobby_registerjust now
belgium_lobby_registerjust now
bundestagjust now
bundestag_lobby_registerjust now
camera_deputatijust now
cap_payments3d ago
chambrejust now
cohesion_financejust now
congresojust now
cordis3d ago
council_positions3d ago
denmark_lobby_registerjust now
desi3d ago
ec_commissioner_meetingsnever
eduskuntajust now
eea3d ago
eib_projectsjust now
ep_draft_agenda1d ago
ep_open_data_meps3h ago
esif3d ago
european_council_summits3d ago
eurostat3d ago
eurostat_cofogjust now
eu_transparency_register3h ago
finland_lobby_registerjust now
folketingetjust now
folketinget-calendar4d ago
fts3d ago
hatvp_lobby_registerjust now
howtheyvote_votesjust now
ireland_lobby_registerjust now
lobbyfactsjust now
nationalratjust now
nationalrat-calendar4d ago
netherlands_lobby_registerjust now
oeil_legislative_proceduresjust now
oireachtasjust now
plenary_agendajust now
public_consultations3d ago
riigikogujust now
riksdagjust now
rrf_allocationsjust now
sejmjust now
spain_lobby_registerjust now
sweden_lobby_registerjust now
ted_procurementjust now
transposition_tracker1d ago
tweede_kamerjust now
wikidata_parliaments13d ago