Skip to content
Feed/IMM2024/2063(IMM)Institutional

Request for the waiver of the immunity of Péter Magyar

COMCMT1R-EP1R-C2R-EPCNCADO
Rapporteur Krzysztof ŚMISZEKCommittee JURIUpdated 7mo ago
View source

This decision concerns a request to waive the parliamentary immunity of Péter Magyar, a Member of the European Parliament elected in Hungary. The waiver was requested by the Prosecutor General of Hungary in connection with alleged criminal proceedings. The case involves Péter Magyar, an elected Member of the European Parliament. The request for waiver of immunity was made by Hungarian authorities in relation to an alleged incident of theft involving a mobile phone. The European Parliament decided not to waive Péter Magyar's immunity. This decision was based on concerns that the legal proceedings might be intended to undermine his political activity, a concept known as 'fumus persecutionis'. The Parliament's decision means that Péter Magyar retains his immunity. The President of the European Parliament will inform the Hungarian authorities and Mr. Magyar of this decision.

AI-generated·3 Apr 2026·Source document·Unverified

The Prosecutor General of Hungary requested the waiver of immunity for Péter Magyar in connection with alleged criminal proceedings.

What changes

  • This decision concerns the European Parliament's response to a request for the waiver of immunity of a Member.

Expected impact

  • Parliament's decision not to waive immunity means Péter Magyar retains his parliamentary immunity.
  • Parliament has broad discretion in deciding on immunity waiver requests due to their political nature.
  • Concerns were raised that the proceedings might be intended to damage the reputation of the Member.

Limitations

  • The document does not contain details on the specific legal qualifications of the alleged offence beyond what is stated in Recital A.
  • The document does not provide information on the specific actions taken by Hungarian authorities during the police investigation.
  • The document does not detail the exact nature of the 'inconsistencies' or 'lack of clarity' mentioned in Recital K.

Some data sources haven't been updated in over 48 hours.

assemblee_nationalejust now
audit_findings3d ago
austria_lobby_registerjust now
belgium_lobby_registerjust now
bundestagjust now
bundestag_lobby_registerjust now
camera_deputatijust now
cap_payments3d ago
chambrejust now
cohesion_financejust now
congresojust now
cordis3d ago
council_positions3d ago
denmark_lobby_registerjust now
desi3d ago
ec_commissioner_meetingsnever
eduskuntajust now
eea3d ago
eib_projectsjust now
ep_draft_agenda1d ago
ep_open_data_meps3h ago
esif3d ago
european_council_summits3d ago
eurostat3d ago
eurostat_cofogjust now
eu_transparency_register3h ago
finland_lobby_registerjust now
folketingetjust now
folketinget-calendar4d ago
fts3d ago
hatvp_lobby_registerjust now
howtheyvote_votesnever
ireland_lobby_registerjust now
lobbyfactsjust now
nationalratjust now
nationalrat-calendar4d ago
netherlands_lobby_registerjust now
oeil_legislative_proceduresjust now
oireachtasjust now
plenary_agendajust now
public_consultations3d ago
riigikogujust now
riksdagjust now
rrf_allocationsjust now
sejmjust now
spain_lobby_registerjust now
sweden_lobby_registerjust now
ted_procurementjust now
transposition_tracker1d ago
tweede_kamerjust now
wikidata_parliaments13d ago