Skip to content
Feed/IMM2024/2042(IMM)Institutional

Request for the waiver of the immunity of Klára Dobrev

COMCMT1R-EP1R-C2R-EPCNCADO
Rapporteur Ilhan KYUCHYUKCommittee JURIUpdated 7mo ago
View source

This decision concerns a request to waive the parliamentary immunity of Klára Dobrev, a Member of the European Parliament. The waiver was requested by a Hungarian court in connection with criminal defamation proceedings initiated by a private party. The case affects Klára Dobrev, an elected Member of the European Parliament from Hungary. The proceedings relate to a social media post she made concerning a public scandal. The European Parliament decided not to waive Ms. Dobrev's immunity. It concluded that the alleged offence was not an opinion expressed or a vote cast in the performance of her parliamentary duties, but also considered that the proceedings might be intended to undermine her political activity. The decision means that Klára Dobrev will retain her parliamentary immunity. The European Parliament will inform the relevant Hungarian authority and Ms. Dobrev of this decision.

AI-generated·2 Apr 2026·Source document·Unverified

A request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Klára Dobrev was submitted by the Budapest II and III District Court.

What changes

  • The European Parliament decides not to waive the immunity of Klára Dobrev.
  • The President of the European Parliament is instructed to forward the decision and the committee's report to the competent authority in Hungary and to Klára Dobrev.

Expected impact

  • The decision not to waive immunity means Klára Dobrev will continue to be protected from legal proceedings in relation to the alleged defamation offence.
  • The purpose of parliamentary immunity is to ensure the independence of Members in performing their duties.
  • The waiver of immunity procedure is based on the principle that Parliament acts to uphold its integrity as a democratic legislative assembly.

Limitations

  • The document does not contain information regarding the specific outcome of the criminal proceedings in Hungary.
  • The document does not detail the 'private motion' filed by the complainant beyond the alleged defamation.
  • The document does not provide the full text of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code or Act No XXXVI of 2012 on the National Assembly.

Some data sources haven't been updated in over 48 hours.

assemblee_nationalejust now
audit_findings3d ago
austria_lobby_registerjust now
belgium_lobby_registerjust now
bundestagjust now
bundestag_lobby_registerjust now
camera_deputatijust now
cap_payments3d ago
chambrejust now
cohesion_financejust now
congresojust now
cordis3d ago
council_positions3d ago
denmark_lobby_registerjust now
desi3d ago
ec_commissioner_meetingsnever
eduskuntajust now
eea3d ago
eib_projectsjust now
ep_draft_agenda1d ago
ep_open_data_meps3h ago
esif3d ago
european_council_summits3d ago
eurostat3d ago
eurostat_cofogjust now
eu_transparency_register3h ago
finland_lobby_registerjust now
folketingetjust now
folketinget-calendar4d ago
fts3d ago
hatvp_lobby_registerjust now
howtheyvote_votesnever
ireland_lobby_registerjust now
lobbyfactsjust now
nationalratjust now
nationalrat-calendar4d ago
netherlands_lobby_registerjust now
oeil_legislative_proceduresjust now
oireachtasjust now
plenary_agendajust now
public_consultations3d ago
riigikogujust now
riksdagjust now
rrf_allocationsjust now
sejmjust now
spain_lobby_registerjust now
sweden_lobby_registerjust now
ted_procurementjust now
transposition_tracker1d ago
tweede_kamerjust now
wikidata_parliaments13d ago