Skip to content
Feed/DEA2024/2686(DEA)Other

Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 810/2009

COMCMT1R-EP1R-C2R-EPCNCADO
Rapporteur Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILARCommittee LIBEUpdated 24mo ago
View source

This resolution objects to a proposed increase in EU visa fees, arguing it is not justified and ill-timed. The European Parliament believes the increase contradicts agreements made during negotiations for a new digital visa system. The proposed fee increase affects third-country nationals applying for visas to enter the EU. It could disproportionately impact marginalised groups, making travel less accessible for them. The Parliament agreed with co-legislators not to raise fees when the visa system was being digitalised. This digital system is expected to save money for both applicants and Member States through reduced administrative work and the elimination of physical visa stickers. The Commission's delegated regulation to increase visa fees is considered a breach of the agreement between EU institutions. Parliament has instructed its President to inform the Commission that the regulation cannot enter into force.

AI-generated·5 Apr 2026·Source document·Unverified

The European Parliament objects to the Commission delegated regulation of 14 March 2024 concerning the amount of visa fees.

What changes

  • Objection to a Commission delegated regulation of 14 March 2024 amending Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 regarding visa fees.
  • The President of the European Parliament is instructed to notify the Commission that the delegated regulation cannot enter into force.

Expected impact

  • Digitalisation of the visa procedure is estimated to result in significant cost savings for Member States, including up to EUR 76.6 million from no longer requiring visa stickers.
  • Implementing an EU visa application platform is expected to reduce administrative burdens on consulates, with estimated savings of up to EUR 521.6 million for Member States between 2025-2029.
  • An increase in visa fees could disproportionately affect marginalised groups.

Limitations

  • The document is a motion for a resolution and does not contain the full text of the Commission delegated regulation it objects to.
  • Specific details on the exact amount of the proposed visa fee increase are not provided in this text.
  • The full impact of the objection on the entry into force of the delegated regulation is not detailed.

Some data sources haven't been updated in over 48 hours.

assemblee_nationalejust now
audit_findings3d ago
austria_lobby_registerjust now
belgium_lobby_registerjust now
bundestagjust now
bundestag_lobby_registerjust now
camera_deputatijust now
cap_payments3d ago
chambrejust now
cohesion_financejust now
congresojust now
cordis3d ago
council_positions3d ago
denmark_lobby_registerjust now
desi3d ago
ec_commissioner_meetingsnever
eduskuntajust now
eea3d ago
eib_projectsjust now
ep_draft_agenda1d ago
ep_open_data_meps2h ago
esif3d ago
european_council_summits3d ago
eurostat3d ago
eurostat_cofogjust now
eu_transparency_register2h ago
finland_lobby_registerjust now
folketingetjust now
folketinget-calendar4d ago
fts3d ago
hatvp_lobby_registerjust now
howtheyvote_votesjust now
ireland_lobby_registerjust now
lobbyfactsjust now
nationalratjust now
nationalrat-calendar4d ago
netherlands_lobby_registerjust now
oeil_legislative_proceduresjust now
oireachtasjust now
plenary_agendajust now
public_consultations3d ago
riigikogujust now
riksdagjust now
rrf_allocationsjust now
sejmjust now
spain_lobby_registerjust now
sweden_lobby_registerjust now
ted_procurementjust now
transposition_tracker1d ago
tweede_kamerjust now
wikidata_parliaments13d ago